Déjà Vu: A Dodgers Grand Slam Spells the End for the Cubs

While watching the Cubs 7-2 loss to the Dodgers on Thursday night, I had an eerie feeling of déjà vu.  While it was in a different city, with a different player at the plate and a different player on the hill, I felt I was watching the exact same scenario unfold.

And that'll do it...

And that'll do it...

A grand slam by the Dodgers to all but end the Cubs' chances of a deep playoff run.

In 2008, it came in Game 1 of the NLDS at Wrigley Field.  The Cubs led 2-0 thanks to second inning Mark DeRosa home run when the Dodgers came to bat in the fifth inning.  Ryan Dempster proceeded to walk the bases loaded (his fifth, sixth and seventh walks of the game), before giving up a granny to James Loney on a 1-2 pitch.

Just like that, the energy was sucked out of Wrigley Field, and even though the Cubs were only trailing by two runs, you could read the same expression on everyone's faces: "Not again."  The Cubs lost that game 7-2 as well, never led the rest of the series, and were swept out of the playoffs for the second straight season.

Fast forward back to Thursday night.  The Cubs, who just two weeks ago were tied for first place in the NL Central, have taken a nose dive and fallen to six games out of first place.  They enter a crucial four-game series with the Dodgers, who their rival Cardinals have just beaten two of three times.

With the score tied at 2-2, the Cubs' Angel Guzman allows base hits to the first two batters, and after a sacrifice, James Loney is intentionally walked to face Russell Martin.  One pitch, and déjà Grand Slam.

Couple the Cubs loss with a Cardinals win in St. Louis and the Cubs are now seven games back in the division with just 43 games left to play.  Their once precious lead in the loss column is now a five game deficit, and the Cubs and Cardinals only have three games remaining on the slate, and that series is in St. Louis.  And don't even think about the Wild Card, as the Cubs trail the Rockies by six games with San Francisco, Atlanta and Florida all in front of them too.

Despite the horrific play in Colorado, the destruction by Philadelphia and even losing two of three to the lowly Padres, including another Kevin Gregg masterpiece, I was still looking for ways the Cubs could make a comeback.  After Thursday night, the parallels are just too similar to last season, so I think it's time to be realistic rather than optimistic.

Don't Group All Cubs Fans with One Drunken Idiot

An ugly incident occurred last night at Wrigley Field, when a full beverage was dropped on the head of Philadelphia Phillies' centerfielder Shane Victorino as he made a catch in the fifth inning.

As a Cubs fan who was in attendance, but not in the bleachers, I stood up and booed when this occurred, as did many people sitting around me.  True Cubs fans know this is unacceptable, despicable, and not the least bit funny.

Bleacher Bums, as they are called, have a reputation of being loud and obnoxious, and rightfully so.  Anyone who would pay $50 (face value) to sit on a bench with no back for a full game, plus the two hours before the game to get good seats is a bit nutty.  Trust me, I've done it multiple times.

But make no mistake, the fans who sit in the bleachers are great Cubs fans, throwing visiting home run balls back, riding opposing outfielders for a misplay, and most importantly, never leaving Carlos Lee alone.

That's why it's upsetting as a Cubs fan when one guy, who likely had too much to drink, goes and ruins it for everyone.

So for those of you thinking or saying things like: "I hope other fans get back at the Cubs" or "The Cubs should be penalized by MLB", need to just slow down for a minute.  It's a natural and acceptable reaction to be angry, but direct the anger towards the one stupid moron, not an entire fan base and organization.

Even though they apparently ejected the wrong fan, Cubs Security was over there in a flash to take care of the situation.  The Chicago PD is apparently conducting a manhunt for the offender, and plans to prosecute him to the fullest extent of the law.

Cubs manager Lou Piniella apologized after the game, saying: "That shouldn't happen, it's not good sportsmanship. ... We apologize to Victorino and the Phillies for that."

And if you had interviewed the majority of fans like me, well, you'd have this article as my response.  So, to the rest of the MLB teams and their fans, please don't group true Blue Cubs fans like me with the few select individuals who do dumb stuff like this.  We really are better than that.

Don't Group All Cubs Fans with One Drunken Idiot

An ugly incident occurred last night at Wrigley Field, when a full beverage was dropped on the head of Philadelphia Phillies' centerfielder Shane Victorino as he made a catch in the fifth inning.

As a Cubs fan who was in attendance, but not in the bleachers, I stood up and booed when this occurred, as did many people sitting around me.  True Cubs fans know this is unacceptable, despicable, and not the least bit funny.

Bleacher Bums, as they are called, have a reputation of being loud and obnoxious, and rightfully so.  Anyone who would pay $50 (face value) to sit on a bench with no back for a full game, plus the two hours before the game to get good seats is a bit nutty.  Trust me, I've done it multiple times.

But make no mistake, the fans who sit in the bleachers are great Cubs fans, throwing visiting home run balls back, riding opposing outfielders for a misplay, and most importantly, never leaving Carlos Lee alone.

That's why it's upsetting as a Cubs fan when one guy, who likely had too much to drink, goes and ruins it for everyone.

So for those of you thinking or saying things like: "I hope other fans get back at the Cubs" or "The Cubs should be penalized by MLB", need to just slow down for a minute.  It's a natural and acceptable reaction to be angry, but direct the anger towards the one stupid moron, not an entire fan base and organization.

Even though they apparently ejected the wrong fan, Cubs Security was over there in a flash to take care of the situation.  The Chicago PD is apparently conducting a manhunt for the offender, and plans to prosecute him to the fullest extent of the law.

Cubs manager Lou Piniella apologized after the game, saying: "That shouldn't happen, it's not good sportsmanship. ... We apologize to Victorino and the Phillies for that."

And if you had interviewed the majority of fans like me, well, you'd have this article as my response.  So, to the rest of the MLB teams and their fans, please don't group true Blue Cubs fans like me with the few select individuals who do dumb stuff like this.  We really are better than that.

Breaking Down the NL Central...It's a Two Horse Race

Since the beginning of the season, the NL Central has been the tightest overall division race in all of baseball.  Currently, four teams are within five games of first place, and as recently as June 28th, all six teams were within that same striking distance of the division title.

With approximately two months two go in the regular season, we are not much closer now to determining the division winner than we were back in April.   As a Cubs fan, I want to know whether I should be setting myself up for a September or October disappointment this season, so I decided took a closer look at the past performance and remaining schedules of each team in the NL Central to try and predict a winner.

Below is a quick snapshot of each team in order of current standings:

Chicago Cubs (57-49)

56 Games Remaining (29 Home, 27 Road)

.485 Remaining Opponent Win Pct

The first advantage the Cubs have is the lead in the loss column.  With the most games remaining of anyone in the division (thanks to rainouts), the Cubs' destiny is in their own hands.

The Cubs will play more than half of their remaining games against teams under the .500 mark, with 30 games coming against teams currently with losing records.  Half of those games are against divisional opponents, as the Cubs face Houston and Cincinnati for one more series apiece, and three more series against last place Pittsburgh.  These are the games the Cubs must win to have a chance.

Divisional games will play an important part in the Cubs' quest to win the Central, as they play 16 of their 25 remaining divisional games in a row from September 7th to September 23rd, including six straight road games against St. Louis and Milwaukee to close out the stretch.

Based on their current home and road winning percentages, the Cubs are predicted to finish the year at 87-75.  In order to reach this number or improve on it, the Cubs will need to win some series on the road, as they are just 24-30 away from Wrigley Field this year.  Road matchups against Colorado, LA Dodgers, NY Mets, and San Francisco will be crucial in the Cubs' quest for the crown.

St. Louis Cardinals (59-51)

52 Games Remaining (27 Home, 25 Road)

.472 Remaining Opponent Win Pct

While the Cubs may have more games remaining, the Cardinals have a more favorable schedule down the stretch.  The Cards have 30 of their final 52 games against divisional opponents, with six games each against Houston, Cincinnati and Pittsburgh.  Combine these with seven games against San Diego and three against bottom of the barrel Washington, that makes for a division-low .472 opponent winning percentage.

The Cardinals' additions in June and July of Mark DeRosa, Julio Lugo and Matt Holliday have made their offense a formidable foe to go along with their strong starting pitching.  The Cards have a run differential of +31 so far this year, which should only improve as a result of their additions.  Look for this to come into play against strong pitching teams like the Dodgers, Cubs, Braves, Rockies and Marlins.

The final factor that could propel the Cards above their current pace of 87-75 is their .500 record on the road.  St. Louis is the only team in the NL Central with a .500 or better record away from home this season, and they will need to maintain this in the final weeks of the season as they embark on a nine-game trip to Houston, Colorado and Cincinnati.

Milwaukee Brewers (54-54) - 4.0 GB

54 Games Remaining (28 Home, 26 Road)

.488 Remaining Opponent Win Pct

The Brewers likely had higher expectations than .500 at this point in the season, but there is still plenty of time to make a run at the postseason.  The Brewers can be in control of their own destiny as a result of their remaining schedule against the division.

The Brewers face NL Central opponents 34 more times, but more importantly 16 of those games are against the first-place Cubs and Cardinals (7 and 9 remaining respectively).  These 16 games come in the Brewers' final 32 of the season in September and October, culminating with a 3-game series in St. Louis over the final weekend of the season

In order for these games to matter, however, the Brewers need to improve upon their current position of four games back during the month of August.  The Brew Crew have 22 straight games against Sub-.500 teams between now and August 30th, including 12 of those at Miller Park.

While all these schedule advantages are helpful to Milwaukee, none of it will matter if they don't get their pitching in order.  The Brewers lead the Central with 536 runs allowed, and are second to last in the NL with a 4.82 team ERA.  Without an improvement in their pitching staff, the Brewers might be sitting at home in October.

Houston Astros (53-55) - 5.0 GB

54 Games Remaining (25 Home, 29 Road)

.500 Remaining Opponent Win Pct

The Astros, despite a rash of recent injuries to their club, are just five games out of first place and two games under .500.  Unfortunately for Houston fans, their remaining schedule doesn't do them many favors.

The 'Stros will play just one-third (18) of their remaining 54 games against sub-.500 teams, half of those being Cincinnati and Pittsburgh.  In addition, of their 27 remaining divisional games, only nine come against first-place Chicago and St. Louis combined, meaning Houston will need some help to gain ground in the Central.

The other obstacle the Astros face is having more road games left than home games, something none of the top three teams in the division need to deal with.  The Astros are just 24-28 away from Minute Maid Park, and spend their final seven games of the season on the road in Philadelphia and New York.

While the Astros have been a notorious second-half team this decade, it doesn't seem like they will be able to make another impressive run to the postseason in 2009.

Cincinnati Reds (46-61) - 11.5 GB

55 Games Remaining (27 Home, 28 Road)

.490 Remaining Opponent Win Pct

This is where we reach the teams without much of a playoff chance.  The Reds looked like they might be for real this year, as they were just 1.5 games out of first place as late as June 10th.  Then injuries struck, the most brutal to starting pitcher Edinson Volquez, who will miss 12 months with Tommy John surgery.

The Reds would need a very favorable schedule to have a chance at the postseason, and it just isn't there.  Only 23 of their remaining 55 games are against sub-.500 teams, and more than half of their remaining games are on the road.  Cincy will have a chance to play spoiler, as they have at least one series left with each of the top four teams in the division.

Pittsburgh Pirates (45-63) - 13.0 GB

54 Games Remaining (29 Home, 25 Road)

.508 Remaining Opponent Win Pct

Another season, another losing record for the Pirates.  The Bucs appear to be rebuilding yet again after gutting their team at the trade deadline.  With 30 of their remaining 54 games against teams above .500, it would appear that a 13 game deficit is too much for the Pirates to overcome.

The Pirates too can play spoiler in the final two months, with a ******** 37 games remaining against NL Central opponents.  The Pirates face the Cubs nine times, Cardinals and Brewers six times apiece, and the Astros twice.  Those 13 games remaining versus Cincinnati will be unlikely to draw large crowds.

So when it comes down to it, in this writer's opinion the NL Central is a two-horse race, with the Cubs and the Cardinals battling it out neck and neck down the stretch.  Milwaukee and Houston are both solid teams, but the Brewers' lack of pitching and the Astros' difficult schedule will likely be too much to overcome.

The Cardinals have given themselves a big boost with the addition of Matt Holliday to protect slugger Albert Pujols, and solidified their lineup with Julio Lugo and Mark DeRosa.  The Cubs added much needed lefty bullpen help with John Grabow and may have picked up a steal with Tom Gorzelanny if he can continue to pitch like he did in Cincinnati on Tuesday.

The two teams have very similar schedules down the stretch, so the division might come down to a three-game series in St. Louis from September 18th-20th.  Whichever team comes through that enormous arch in first place will have the upper hand and likely take the division crown.

For now, I'm going to give my biased edge to the Cubs, as there is a good chance they could sweep their final six home games against Pittsburgh and Arizona, while the Cards are on the road in Cincinnati and then host Milwaukee on the final weekend of the season.

Call Me Crazy...but the Cubs Should Consider Trading Jake Fox

The 2009 season for the Chicago Cubs has not gone exactly as planned. Injuries, power outages, suspensions, "lack of fire", you name it, it's gone wrong for the Cubs so far this year.

One bright spot for the team this season has been midseason call-up Jake Fox. In 23 games over his two stints with the big league club this season, Fox has hit .317 with 3 HR and 12 RBI. Prior to his callup, he was lighting up AAA Iowa, with obscene stats of .409 BA, 17 HR and 53 RBI in just 45 games.  The only knock on Fox is his defense. He has performed decently well playing 3B, LF and RF this year, but he is best suited as a designated hitter.

With Aramis Ramirez scheduled to return from the disabled list on Monday, and the Cubs paying Alfonso Soriano and Milton Bradley far too much for them to sit on the bench (despite their play), Fox appears to be headed to the bench, or potentially even back to AAA.

Too much offense is a good problem for the Cubs to have, but it won't fix the issues with the bullpen. The Cubs called up Jeff Samardzija from AAA, sending down right-hander Jose Ascanio.  While Samardzija shows promise, his 8.10 ERA during his first stint in the majors this year is part of the reason the Cubs are near the bottom of the league when it comes to the 'pen.

The Cubs bullpen ERA is currently 18th in the league at 4.07. In addition, their K/BB ratio is 1.48, good for 27th in the league, and their WHIP is an ugly 1.50, tying them for 25th in the majors.  In addition, the pen is suffering from a bit of overuse. Closer Kevin Gregg has worked on consecutive days nine times, and primary setup man Carlos Marmol has done it 15 times already this year.

The final issue with the Cubs bullpen is imbalance. After spending the majority of the offseason trying to put a lefty-righty balance into the lineup, GM Jim Hendry has a bullpen with just one left-hander, former starter Sean Marshall.  The Cubs are in sore need of a lefty specialist who can work for one batter or one inning, so manager Lou Piniella is not forced to use Marshall in matchup situations. This problem has cost the Cubs a few games, including last Saturday against the rival White Sox.

In this writer's humble opinion, the Cubs have a surplus of hitters, including one without a position, and a need for a left-handed bullpen arm. Jake Fox has been great so far for the Cubs this year, but at the same time, his trade value might never be higher this season than it is right now.

The Cubs should obviously wait to make sure that Aramis Ramirez is fully recovered and able to play everyday before even thinking of making a trade like this. However, it might not be such a bad idea for Jim Hendry to start working the phones to see if there are any lefties available. American league teams should certainly have an interest in Jake Fox.

Should the Cubs Move Alfonso Soriano Back to Second Base?

When Alfonso Soriano was acquired by the Washington Nationals prior to the 2006 season, the club wanted to convert him from a second baseman to an outfielder. The Nats already had a second baseman in Jose Vidro, but Soriano wanted no part of the switch and sat out a few spring training games as a protest.  Eventually, Soriano gave in to the wishes of his manager (so as not to forfeit any salary) and made the All-Star Game as a left-fielder.

Fast forward to May 2009, and the Chicago Cubs find themselves in the opposite situation of the 2006 Nationals. The Cubs traded away Mark DeRosa in the offseason, and have recently lost replacements Aaron Miles and Ryan Freel to injury. 

The Cubs' normal second baseman, Mike Fontenot, has been forced to switch to third base due to another injury to Aramis Ramirez, leaving manager Lou Piniella short on options at two of the infield positions.  If Freel goes on the DL, as expected, the Cubs will likely recall Bobby Scales from Triple-A Iowa as his replacement, but the infield depth will still be thin.

soriano-afraid-running-wall.jpg

In the outfield, however, the Cubs have plenty of options. Soriano, Kosuke Fukudome, Reed Johnson, Milton Bradley, and Micah Hoffpauir are all in the mix, with recent call-up Jake Fox looking for at-bats as well.

Until the most recent series against the Pittsburgh Pirates, the Cubs had been in an offensive slump. On a recent six-game road trip against St. Louis and San Diego, the Cubs managed just five runs, losing all six of the games. The team has attempted to solve this problem by calling up Fox, but it means nothing if there is no way to get his bat in the starting lineup.

One solution, albeit a crazy one, is to move Soriano back to second base. Not having played there much over the last three-plus seasons will make him a defensive liability, but no more so than inserting Fox at third base.  Soriano does have a great arm in the outfield, but he is not the best fielder out there either.  Moving Soriano to second opens up an outfield slot for Reed Johnson, Micah Hoffpauir, or Jake Fox, and also gives Piniella more flexibility with double switches later in games. 

This is definitely not a permanent solution, and once Aramis Ramirez returns there will be no need for it. But Ramirez is anywhere from four to six weeks away from returning, and the Cubs could fall too far back in the division during that time for it to matter. 

Unfortunately, the Cubs can't play the Pirates every game, and with the Dodgers in town this weekend and interleague play on the horizon, the Cubs need to do something to wake up their bats in a hurry.

Even Injuries Go Right For the Cubs in Win Over Brew Crew

The Chicago Cubs beat the Brewers 8-5 on Sunday night in a game where everything went their way. The Cubs scored eight runs on just five hits, thanks to the bat of Alfonso Soriano and an inning of wildness by the Brewers' pitching staff.

Soriano hit the first pitch of the game from Jeff Suppan off the scoreboard in center field to give the Cubs an early lead.  After the Brewers tied the game 1-1, the Cubs loaded the bases in the fourth inning when Milton Bradley was hit by a pitch, Mike Fontenot walked, and Ryan Theriot singled up the middle. 

On the Theriot single, Milton Bradley came up lame when he took off for second, and was forced to leave the game with apparent groin tightness.  Who had Game Six in the "When Does Milton Bradley Get Injured Pool?"  Reed Johnson replaced him, which turned out to be a great decision by manager Lou Piniella.

Then it got interesting.  Jeff Suppan proceeded to walk Koyie Hill, Alfonso Soriano, and Kosuke Fukudome with the bases loaded, forcing in three runs.  Jorge Julio came on in relief and walked Derrek Lee, allowing the Cubs to score four runs on just one hit in the inning.

Then, in the bottom of the fifth, with the Cubs leading 6-2, starter Ryan Dempster tried to give up the lead by loading the bases with no outs.  Prince Fielder then crushed a ball into right field which appeared to tie the game.  Not so fast.  Bradley's replacement Reed Johnson made this catch to keep the ball in the park and hold Fielder to a sac fly.

Would Bradley have made that catch?  No one can say for sure, but my best guess  would be absolutely no way.  Brewers manager Ken Macha had this to say:  "I don't know. Milton is a pretty good defender, how am I going to figure that one out?"

Either way, despite another shaky outing from Kevin Gregg in the ninth, the Cubs left Milwaukee with an 8-5 win and a 4-2 road trip to start the season.  Lou Piniella said it best:

"A 4-2 road trip, I think everybody would've been pleased when we started the season this past Monday to take two out of three in your division's home ballparks -- you have to be pleased with it," Piniella said. "Now we're home and we'll see what happens."

(All quotes taken from cubs.com)

Milton Bradley Hurts Himself in Cubs Debut: Fans Not Surprised

In January, the Cubs signed outfielder Milton Bradley to a three-year, $30 million deal to be the new right fielder. The Cubs knew of his injury history, but Bradley's impressive stats were enough to take the risk that he would be able to avoid injury. 

It lasted one spring at bat.

Bradley took himself out of Thursday's game after he drew a walk in the first inning because of mild tightness in his left quad.

"I didn't do too much in the game, I felt it before when warming up, so I let them know it felt tighter than it should have been," Bradley said. "Since we have a quarter of a season worth of games in spring training, I felt the best course of action was to let them know right now. If it's April 6, I play."

So it appears the injury is nothing serious, but Bradley is just being overly cautious and trying to avoid further injury. He expects to return to the lineup this weekend against the White Sox.

However, this does bring up one important question for Cubs fans: Bradley said that if today was opening day, he would have played through the pain. So does this mean Bradley will be playing hurt for most of the year? 

Is he not going to tell the training staff about certain bumps and bruises? 

Will this affect his defense?

If you're a true Cubs fan, this news doesn't faze you, since it was always a matter of when Bradley would get hurt, not if. However, if you're like me, you probably expected it to be on a chilly April day in the Friendly Confines, not in sunny Mesa, Arizona. 

Adam Dunn might strike out a lot, but he's never played less than 152 games in a full season. Oh, and he's hit 40-plus homers for six straight years. 

Here's to praying Bradley plays more than half the games this season.

Chicago Cubs Trade Felix Pie and Ronny Cedeno...but Not for Jake Peavy

On Wednesday, the Chicago Cubs traded shortstop Ronny Cedeno and newly-acquired pitcher Garrett Olson to the Seattle Mariners for pitcher Aaron Heilman.  My question is why?

There are reports that Heilman will compete for the Cubs' fifth spot in the starting rotation with the likes of Sean Marshall and the best wide receiver in the city of Chicago, Jeff Samardzija. 

Others speculate that he will come out of the bullpen to pitch in a long-reliever role, helping to set up the eighth and ninth-inning combination of Kevin Gregg and Carlos Marmol.

Heilman prefers to start, but has only done so 25 times in his career, and not since 2005.  He is already 30 years old, and his career ERA is 4.24. Prior to last year's abysmal 5.25 showing, he had three straight seasons with a sub-3.70 ERA.  His career K/BB ratio is only 2.18, and he strikes out only 7.9 batters per 9 innings.

Looking at the stats, Heilman is a decent pitcher, and you could do far worse for a long man or a fifth starter.  But he is definitely NOT worth what the Cubs paid to get him.

In a deal that was eerily similar to the one involving former can't-miss prospect Corey Patterson a few years earlier, the Cubs dealt center fielder Felix Pie to the Baltimore Orioles.  In return, they received lefty Olson and Class-A right-hander Henry Williamson.  This trade by itself is not horrible, as Pie just hasn't proven he can hit on the big league level.

When you combine the fact that the Cubs dealt Olson along with Cedeno for Pie, the deal just becomes outright awful.  Cedeno, Pie, and Olson were key chips in the potential trade for Padres starter Jake Peavy.  While I'm not sure if a deal was ever close to occurring, it seemed that most of the moves the Cubs had made this offseason were gearing towards a deal. 

Negotiations stalled at the winter meetings because the Cubs didn't have the prospects that the Padres needed.  For this reason, the clubs unsuccessfully tried to involve a third team in the trade to meet the Padres' requirements.  Once that failed, the Cubs traded Mark DeRosa for three minor league pitchers and Pie for two more.  It seemed everything was falling into place.  Then the Heilman deal.

So while trading Garrett Olson and Ronny Cedeno for Aaron Heilman is a pretty balanced deal on its own, when you swap out Olson for Pie and then factor in that the Cubs essentially gave up on Peavy by doing this, it doesn't seem worth it at all.

Chicago Cubs 2009 Offseason: Has The Team Improved?

On Monday, the Cubs inked Milton Bradley to a three-year deal in what is the latest of a flurry of offseason moves by GM Jim Hendry.  With the addition of Bradley, the Cubs' lineup takes on a slightly different feel.  Below is a quick look.

Lineup A:

SS Ryan Theriot

LF Alfonso Soriano

1B Derrek Lee

3B Aramis Ramirez

RF Kosuke Fukudome

2B Mark DeRosa

C Geovany Soto

CF Felix Pie

P Carlos Zambrano

CL Kerry Wood

Bench: Daryle Ward, Reed Johnson, Mike Fontenot, Henry Blanco, Ronny Cedeno

Lineup B:

LF Alfonso Soriano

SS Ryan Theriot

1B Derrek Lee

3B Aramis Ramirez

RF Milton Bradley

C Geovany Soto

2B Mike Fontenot

CF Kosuke Fukudome

P Carlos Zambrano

CL Carlos Marmol

Bench: Daryle Ward (I'd prefer Micah Hoffpauir), Reed Johnson, Aaron Miles, Paul Bako, Joey Gathright

If you're a Chicago Cubs fan, you know Lineup A is from Opening Day 2008.  After Monday's signing of outfielder Milton Bradley, Lineup B is my projection for Lou Piniella's team for the 2009 season (against a right-handed starter). 

Looking at these two lineups, after all their recent offseason maneuvers, is the current version of the Cubs an improvement at all from the team swept in the 2008 NLDS? 

OFFENSE

In the starting lineup, Felix Pie and Mark DeRosa have been replaced by Milton Bradley and Mike Fontenot.  Bradley is clearly an upgrade to Reed Johnson/Jim Edmonds/Felix Pie at the plate, and can switch-hit, but defensively the drop is much more significant. 

As everyone under the sun has noted, Bradley has rarely ever played over 100 games in the field, and his health concerns are a large liability.  Fontenot provides Piniella with a nice left-handed alternative in the lineup, but the versatility lost in the field by trading DeRosa is enormous. 

I know, I know, that's where the bench comes in.  Aaron Miles can play 2B, SS, 3B (kind of), and OF. Reed Johnson and Joey Gathright can play multiple outfield positions, but Ward (or Hoffpauir) and Bako are one-position guys.  Defensively, the bench is very similar to 2008, but offensively it has dropped. 

Sure Aaron Miles hit .315 last year, but that's the only time he has hit above .300 in his career (not including his 4-for-12 season with the White Sox in 2003).  Last season was Joey Gathright's first above 100 games played, and he has also only hit above .300 once in his career (2007). 

Paul Bako previously played for the Cubs, and he is no Hank White, I can tell you that.  Bako's career batting average is .231, with a career high of .272 way back in 1998.

PITCHING

2008 Starting Rotation - Carlos Zambrano, Ted Lilly, Ryan Dempster, Rich Hill, Jason Marquis

2009 Starting Rotation - Carlos Zambrano, Ted Lilly, Ryan Dempster, Rich Harden, Jeff Samardzija / Sean Marshall

So before you think I'm all negative, the starting rotation has clearly improved.  Last season's midseason acquisition of Rich Harden and this season's preseason trade of Jason Marquis make the Cubs' rotation one of, if not the most formidable in the National League.

An addition of Jake Peavy would only make the case for this being one of the best starting rotations in history, so I don't see much more analysis needed here.

2008 Bullpen - Kevin Hart, Kerry Wood (CL), Carlos Marmol, Bob Howry, Carmen Pignatiello, Michael Wuertz, Jon Lieber (Scott Eyre and Angel Guzman on DL)

2009 Bullpen - Jeff Samardzija / Sean Marshall, Carlos Marmol (CL), Chad Gaudin, Neal Cotts, Kevin Hart, Kevin Gregg, Luis Vizcaino

The bullpen suffers an immediate hit as Carlos Marmol is moved from set-up man to closer.  Marmol is an amazing pitcher, and his 114 strikeouts in just 87.1 IP last year is unheard of.  He was one of the main reasons the Cubs got so many save opportunities last year. 

But can Marmol hold up under the pressure of the ninth inning?  Will Cubs fans turn on him as they did during his bad slump during the 2008 season?

On top of that, who gets him the ball in the ninth inning with the lead?  "Proven" veterans Chad Gaudin and Neal Cotts?  Young gun Kevin Hart?  Newly acquired Kevin Gregg or Luis Vizcaino?  I'm glad we have a potential lights-out closer in Marmol, but we can't count on our starters to go eight innings every game to give him a lead to work with.

OVERALL

Lineup - Advantage: Even

The 2009 Lineup is better in terms of balance and power, but defensively the 2008 lineup is superior.

Bench - Advantage: 2008

Paul Bako pretty much says it all. 

Starting Pitching - Advantage: 2009

Plus Rich Harden, minus Jason Marquis = Advantage 2009

Bullpen - Advantage: 2008

In both years we have an unproven closer, but in 2008 Wood had Marmol.

Overall- Advantage: TBD

Before you write this off as a cop-out answer let me make one point.  There is virtually no way the Cubs can improve on the regular season of 2008. Anything less than a division title (and the best record in the NL) would be a huge disappointment.  There is literally no way the Cubs can have a worse postseason than 2008.  None.  So only October will truly be able to tell whether or not these moves have made a difference.